Accountancy giant PwC hit the headlines during the 89th Academy Awards Oscars show.

Confused as to why a global financial giant was implicated in an Oscars blunder? It’s actually fairly straight forward.

The auditor is in charge of the balloting process, and as part of this is charged with guarding the envelopes that reveal the winners.

This means that PwC is to blame for the Best Picture mishap which saw La La Land announced as the winner of the coveted award when in fact it was destined for Moonlight.

The company has since released a statement saying it deeply regretted the mistake and that “the presenters had mistakenly been given the wrong category envelope”.

“We are currently investigating how this could have happened and deeply regret that this occurred,” said PwC US.

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

 

The real scandal

All fun and games aside, last night’s event has led eyes away from a slightly bigger scandal you should know about.

The UK accountancy watchdog, the Financial Reporting Council (FRC), has announced it is investigating PwC in relation to an audit of financial statements of IT group Redcentric for the two years ended 31 March 2015 and 31 March 2016.

In a statement, the FRC said the investigation will consider, but not be restricted to, issues regarding misstated accounting balances.

The accounting irregularities at Redcentric were noticed in November 2016. The company had begun a review of its current and historic balance sheets when the misstated accounts were noticed

The company’s chief financial officer, Tim Coleman, resigned as a director of the company straight away, while Redcentric announced a day later that he has been “served notice … and placed on gardening leave with immediate effect”.

Deloitte and Nabarro were appointed to carry out an independent forensic review.

The IT group saw its shares plunge 66 percent in November once the irregularities were announced. As well as a hit on the shares, the mistakes meant the company needed to reduce its net assets by around £10m, making the company’s debt around £30m, instead of the £17m it suggested in September.

PwC UK released a statement to say it would “cooperate fully with the FRC in its enquiries”.

When contacted, Redcentric decline to comment.