There are two common – and contradictory – misconceptions about the extent to which European Union (EU) member states can support their own national industries.

On the one hand, some anti-EU campaigners claim that EU rules make it impossible to provide help to their own industries, as we saw in response to the crisis in the British steel industry last spring. On the other hand, some argue that there is too much state support for struggling industries (usually in other countries or for industries to which they are ideologically opposed).

Green Member of the European Parliament (MEP) Molly Scott Cato’s challenge to the EU Commission this week, for permitting the French government to give €4.5bn ($4.7bn) to the troubled nuclear energy group Areva is the most recent example of this.

But how can both of these be true? Well, they’re not. They are misrepresentations of the actual EU rules, used by politicians to bash the EU in pursuit of their own ideological political agenda.

Yes, EU member states have agreed to a joint set of rules about the kinds of state aid that are allowable within our European single market. Without them, EU governments would compete to subsidise their manufacturers, the richest country would spend itself into a dominant position, and the rest of us would suffer.

But the rules do allow appropriate aid in defined circumstances: to help an industry in difficulty, to support new development, environmentally or socially beneficial developments, etc.

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

To try to blame the EU for national decisions, be they our own government’s refusal to act or other governments acting to support their own industries within the rules, is the height of political dishonesty.

Take last year’s threat to the British steel industry caused by China’s ‘dumping’ of cheap steel. GermanyFrance and Italy  provided entirely legitimate support to their own industries, but Britain did not.  The Conservative government’s hypocrisy reached its peak when it opposed stronger EU action to counter the dumping of Chinese steel on the European market.

The EU has trade defence instruments to deal with situations like this. EU governments have been trying for a while to strengthen them. But any agreement on doing so has been blocked by a minority of countries led by the British Conservative government.

This made a mockery of the government’s claims that they would “continue to do all [they] can” in defence of our industry — only to admit rather sheepishly 24 hours later that, in fact, they were not prepared to coordinate tough anti-dumping measures against China with our European allies.

European countries, acting together, have the clout to put real pressure on foreign governments over issues such as steel dumping. Doing so would protect jobs and industries within the EU by ensuring a level playing field – but only if the member states are prepared to stand united.

This, not problems with our jointly agreed rules on state aid, is the real threat to our industries.