Argus Information & Advisory Services, a market analysis firm, has agreed to a $37m settlement with the US government, resolving allegations that it improperly used and retained credit card data obtained through contracts with federal regulators.
The settlement highlights the importance of contractors abiding by terms and maintaining the integrity of government-supplied data.
Go deeper with GlobalData
The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has recently intensified its efforts to restrain mass data collectors and contain the widespread mishandling of sensitive data by the US’ Big Tech companies.
In June last year, the US watchdog took aim at Meta over the mishandling of users’ private data and imposed sanctions. In the same month, the FTC also took Microsoft to task of data privacy infringements.
The settlement is related to Argus’s access and use of credit card data obtained through contracts with federal regulators.
Argus, based in Delaware with offices in White Plains, analyses economic transactions and credit bureau data to provide benchmarking and market analysis products.
How well do you really know your competitors?
Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.
Thank you!
Your download email will arrive shortly
Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample
We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form
By GlobalDataBetween 2010 and 2020, Argus is accused of improperly accessing, using, and retaining anonymised credit card data received under government contracts.
Allegations include the creation of synthetic data from anonymised credit card data, incorporated into products sold to commercial clients, without disclosing improper access.
The US claims Argus breached its contracts by using synthetic data and failing to disclose these practices.
The synthetic data used did not include personally identifiable information.
The settlement reflects a commitment to holding companies accountable for breaching agreements and misusing sensitive data for commercial gain.
