Silicon Valley billionaire Vinod Khosla is fighting a 50-year-old law in a bid to keep surfers off of his beachfront property.

Khosla wants to block the public from entering his 53-acre plot in Martin’s Beach, 33 miles south of San Francisco. However, current Californian law states that the general public must be given access to all of the state’s shorelines, regardless of personal property laws.

Martin’s Beach is popular among surfers and Khosla was warned before purchasing the property that he would have to keep it open to the public.

However, soon after purchasing the property, Khosla locked the access gate, prompting a lengthy court case that has now made its way to the highest federal court in the United States.

A Californian court ruled against him in 2014 and the ruling was upheld in August last year.

However, Khosla has now turned to the Supreme Court. Armed with 151 pages of documents, the tech billionaire will argue that the ruling breaches his personal property rights.

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData

What was said:

Following the 2014 ruling which went against Khosla, his lawyer Dori Yob said:

“We will continue to seek protection of the constitutional rights of private property owners that are guaranteed by the US and California Constitutions and that have long been upheld by the United States and California Supreme Courts.”

Khosla’s supporting documents will argue that the case is a “textbook physical invasion of private property”.

Mark Massara, a lawyer fighting against Khosla, has stated that accepting Khosla’s demands would be “frankly catastrophic” for Californians.

Why it matters:

Khosla will be pitting the US Code’s personal property laws against California’s 1976 Coastal Act.

Should the Supreme Court rule in Khosla’s favour, it would set a precedent. This would potentially allow California’s other wealthy beachside property owners to follow suit.

There is an ongoing battle between property owners and beachgoers. Should the court decide property laws overrule coastal laws, Californians could lose access to vast swathes of beach.


Khosla paid $32.5 million to purchase the plot back in 2008. He doesn’t currently live at Martins Beach. However, he previously stated that he is fighting the case as a matter of principle.

Khosla’s net worth is estimated at $2.4 billion according to Forbes.

The Silicon Valley billionaire made his fortune as the cofounder of computer hardware firm Sun Microsystems, once a big player in the computer market.

Khosla now runs Khosla Ventures, an investment firm focusing on experimental tech.