On Wednesday night, France’s two presidential candidates, the centrist 39-year-old former economy minister Emmanuel Macron and Marine Le Pen, leader of the far-right National Front engaged in a heated televised debate.
Macron and Le Pen disagree on almost everything — EU membership, relations with Russia, how to contain terrorism and how to improve France’s stagnant economy.
But how did the debate go down on social media?
Some views from the British public
Peter Timmins, who describes himself as a “blissfully retired European” decided to give some advice to British prime minister Theresa May by applauding the way the French candidates debated with each other.
How well do you really know your competitors?
Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.
Your download email will arrive shortly
Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample
We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below formBy GlobalData
May, had you tuned into French TV you could have watched politicians debate openly. You on the other hand just hide like a frightened puppy
— Peter Timmins (@petertimmins3) 4 May 2017
Harry Leslie Smith, who boasts over 90,000 followers on Twitter, also compared the UK to France, attacking May for refusing to engage in real debate.
— Harry Leslie Smith (@Harryslaststand) 3 May 2017
David Head, who describes himself as “allergic to xenophobia, tribal nationalism & UKIP” makes the same observation.
You have to envy/admire the French: a two-hour (!) debate between Presidential rivals. In UK, PM & Corbyn hiding behind the sofa. #GE2017
— David Head (@DavidHeadViews) 4 May 2017
Laurie Ryder from Gloucester in southwest England tweeted that she is surprised Macron is popular in Paris, despite his pro-immigration policies.
— Laurie Ryder (@RealLaurieRyder) 4 May 2017
A 21-year-old who studies at Royal Holloway in London and is co-president of the university’s EU students’ society tweeted that she was disappointed by the tone of the debate.
— Em (@EmAcln23) 3 May 2017
Some views from the American public
Matthew Yglesias, who lives in Washington criticised Macron’s elitism. His tweet has already been liked over a thousand times.
Macron’s decision to debate in French makes him seem pretty elitist. No way that’ll play in the Rust Belt.
— Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) 3 May 2017
Ashley from Texas tweeted in support of the National Front leader, suggesting Le Pen’s presidential win is imminent.
— Ashley (@luvofUSA) 4 May 2017
What are journalists saying?
Dave Weigel who covers politics for The Washington Post and has over 300,000 followers on Twitter tweeted that history will repeat itself — a Le Pen victory is unlikely.
Hello, trolls! After Sunday, the Le Pen family will have lost the 1974, 1988, 1995, 2002, 2007, 2012, and 2017 French elections.
— Dave Weigel (@daveweigel) 4 May 2017
Malkah Nobigrot is a broadcaster who works for one of Mexico’s popular news channels Efekto TV. She observed the passion of both candidates in her tweet.
Wow, Macron vs Le Pen…getting really hot and nasty….a real debate
— Malkah Nobigrot (@MalkahNobigrot) 3 May 2017
A Swedish photographer and freelance journalist using the handle @PeterSweden7 complimented Le Pen’s manner during the debate.
Le Pen came across as calm and presidential during the debate. Macron looked more like a angry kid to be honest.
— PeterSweden (@PeterSweden7) 3 May 2017
Katie Hopkins, who appeared on The Apprentice in 2007 and now writes for the Mail Online and presents on LBC was also critical of Macron.
Hopkins has over 600,000 followers on Twitter.
Macron gets 2 mins to talk to the French people direct. 10 seconds in and I’m bored out of my tree #Debat2017
— Katie Hopkins (@KTHopkins) 3 May 2017
Others took a different view.
Pierre Briançon, a 64-year-old senior correspondent for Politico noted Le Pen’s descent into shouting towards the end of the debate.
Le Pen shouting at Macron looks in total meltdown now. Thankfully only 4 minutes of this left. 2 mn each.
— Pierre Briançon (@pierrebri) 3 May 2017
Andrew Neil, BBC presenter and the former editor of The Sunday Times tweeted that Le Pen’s comments relating to war in Algeria played into Macron’s hands.
Neil boasts over 600,000 followers on Twitter.
Le Pen attacks Macron for claiming France committed crimes against humanity in Algeria. History pretty much on Macron’s side on this one.
— Andrew Neil (@afneil) 3 May 2017
Peter Allen, a journalist and author based in Paris tweeted that he agrees with Macron’s criticism of Le Pen’s understanding of economics.
Hard to disagree with Macron’s damning premise that Le Pen knows absolutely nothing about economics. #Debat2017
— Peter Allen (@peterallenparis) 3 May 2017
The editorial director and columnist for Le Monde, the popular French daily newspaper, Sylvie Kauffmann noted Le Pen’s failure to clearly outline her own policies for the country at the beginning of the debate.
For the first 18 minutes, Le Pen has been on the attack against Macron, without putting forward any of her propositions #2017LeDebat
— Sylvie Kauffmann (@SylvieKauffmann) 3 May 2017
Rather than focusing on either candidate, the Paris bureau chief for The Guardian pointed out that the environment was not mentioned during the debate.
2.5 hours of debate. No proper questions on the environment #2017LeDebat
— Angelique Chrisafis (@achrisafis) 3 May 2017
The deputy global news editor of Buzzfeed, Ryan Broderick decided that neither Le Pen nor Macron emerged as the clear winner of the debate.
— Ryan Broderick (@broderick) 3 May 2017
How about people involved in research, policy-making and academia?
Michiel van Hulten, a 48-year-old former Dutch politician who is now an independent consultant and a visiting senior fellow at the London School of Economics (LSE) applauded Macron’s performance.
Macron takes Le Pen seriously every step of the way. Slaps down her lies, and then quietly outguns her with facts and figures. #LeGrandDebat
— Michiel van Hulten (@mvanhulten) 3 May 2017
Unlike Macron’s use of facts and figures, Le Pen talked “nonsense,” according to Timothy Garton Ash, a historian and professor of European studies at Oxford University.
— Timothy Garton Ash (@fromTGA) 3 May 2017
Camille Bullot also tweeted her support for Macron. She is the director of operations and engagement at the European Patients’ Forum, a public health organisation working across Europe.
— Camille Bullot (@hello_camille) 3 May 2017
Cecile Alduy, a professor of French literature at Stanford University said that there were stark differences between the way Le Pen and Macron handled the debate.
#Debat2017 Absolute contrast between Macron, serious, dignified, eloquent, and Le Pen giggling, defaming, insulting judges, opponents
— cecile alduy (@cecilealduy) 3 May 2017