While often talked about separately, the Great Resignation and the work from home (WFH) movement are inextricably linked. Both are pandemic-born, and have propagated a number of technological trends, including greater focus on security, collaboration, and productivity. But technology is not always the solution to problems and it can actually make things worse, especially when taken too far.
WFH is here to stay, no matter what CEOs and traditional business pundits say. Employees are generally happier, more productive, and use less resources travelling. There are other benefits as well. Companies and employees are no longer geographically constrained, jobs and people to fill them can come from almost anywhere, widening the pool of opportunities for both.
However, some companies are unable to accept the new reality of WFH or are uncomfortable with it. These companies are either trying to make work from home unpalatable or have genuine but misguided ideas about productivity. Many of these companies have turned to using productivity monitoring software to keep tabs on employees. These kinds of software can monitor mouse movement, capture keystrokes, email, Zoom sessions, screen shots, and even allow managers to live view employees anytime they want. Some even claim to be able to help prevent insider trading and industrial espionage.
WFH and automated management
It seems appealing to automate management tasks, like ensuring that employees are productive. Employee productivity software is a great example of something that companies can do, but shouldn’t. Beyond the obvious privacy considerations of things like live-view web cams, productivity software sets the tone of the relationship between the company and the employee.
Widespread use of productivity monitoring software signals a profound distrust in employees and infantilizes them. It turns what should be a professional and mutually beneficial relationship into rivalry, management vs. employee. The lack of trust and the lack of professional regard is a real demotivation for employees, particularly those that are not having productivity issues.
What happens if two out of 20 employees are having productivity issues and the company implements productivity monitoring software on all 20? The company will likely gain back productivity for those two employees. But the rest, who have been performing well, will be demotivated and demoralized. Two underperforming employees are better than 18 demoralized, de-motived, and resentful ones. Employees find it unfair to be lumped into the same category as underperformers, which can lead them to go looking for new jobs, increasing turnover in the midst of the Great Resignation.
Productivity monitoring software can hinder recruitment
To make things worse, the extensive use of productivity monitoring software becomes a hiring issue. Especially for potential new hires that are not near retirement age, there is a profound preference for companies that treat them well, compensate well, and trust them enough to not micromange. Happiness is valued more than simple compensation. Potential new hires will accept jobs at competitor companies for less money if it means no productivity monitoring software.
Managing people is fundamentally hard. The idea of making managing easier, combined with handy-dandy dashboards and ready-made metrics are something many managers have a hard time resisting. There is a case to be made that for employees that are having productivity problems, a monitoring software could be used as part of a performance improvement plan. But outside of limited use-cases like that, it’s on the manager to do the real work of communicating with their employees, understanding their strengths and weaknesses, and fostering a relationship where the trust is mutual; employees will do the work they are paid to do, and employers will not treat them like children or serfs.
Wide implementation of employee monitoring software won’t change what managers really need to do, but conversely it could make it a lot harder in the long run.